Love it or Hate it: Jane Eyre
It’s back! Our love it or hate it featured post was on hiatus for many months but we are bringing it back this year.
Have you ever noticed how some books seem to drive a wedge between people? You check the reviews and find almost no middle-of-the-road ratings. Instead people either seem to love it or hate it. Well, welcome to the Love it or Hate it post category! Each month, we’ll pick one book to review and two contributors will battle it out to convince you to pick it up or throw it out.
This month’s selection is the classic Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte. Considered to be a gothic masterpiece, Jane Eyre makes it onto several “best of” and “must read lists,” including Boxall’s 1001 List of Books to Read Before you Die. But the book also has its detractors. So the question is… do you Love it or Hate it? Continue reading to find see our two reviews and cast your vote in the debate.
Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte
First Published in:
Find it here: Jane Eyre
Synopsis (from Goodreads): Orphaned into the household of her Aunt Reed at Gateshead and subject to the cruel regime at Lowood charity school, Jane Eyre nonetheless emerges unbroken in spirit and integrity. She takes up the post of governess at Thornfield, falls in love with Mr. Rochester, and discovers the impediment to their lawful marriage in a story that transcends melodrama to portray a woman’s passionate search for a wider and richer life than Victorian society traditionally allowed.
With a heroine full of yearning, the dangerous secrets she encounters, and the choices she finally makes, Charlotte Bronte’s innovative and enduring romantic novel continues to engage and provoke readers.
Love it (Reviewer A): If you hate this book, you are dead to me. I LOVE Jane Eyre. I have read it at least 4 times and own a beautifully illustrated Folio edition of the book – yes, I shelled out over $60 to buy this classic. I first read Jane Eyre as a teenager and I credit it for being one of the books that lead me to seek out and devour a great number of classics including every other work by the Bronte sisters.
Why did I love it? Jane Eyre is one of those classics that feels intimate and mesmerizing. Jane talks to the reader confiding her innermost thoughts and passions. It’s also one of the few books of it’s era that yields significant power to a female narrator. Jane is no fragile flower to be placed on a pedestal to be admired. She is the ultimate female heroine (granted within the context of the time period in which it was written). Jane’s struggle for self-realization, her perseverance in the face of adversity, and her strong personality and wisdom make her one of the few examples of strong women in Victorian literature. For a Victorian-era woman she was spunky, outspoken, and entirely captivating to me.
When I read the book as a teen I liked the love story and the ultimate conclusion. As an adult, I think Rochester is kind of a jerk and there are parts of their relationship that make me cringe. But regardless of my age I have continued to find the story captivating specifically because the strength of the Jane and the ways in which Bronte managed so cleverly to pull us into experiencing Jane’s inner thoughts and emotions.
Hate it (Reviewer B): I remember in high school many girls thought it was “so romantic!” Huh? Not that any of us much experience with romance; I certainly didn’t at the tender age of 14 as a freshman in Sister Audrey’s English class. But I did NOT understand my fellow classmates swooning over the man. Rochester is an insufferable jerk who has already admitted to using a woman in France, and who now ignores the child. Newsflash … giving her nice dresses and providing her with a governess does NOT equal being a true father to the girl. He’s also manipulative; e.g. the gypsy garb scene. And I’m not even getting into his lying about his marital status and keeping his insane wife locked in the attic. Jane was right to run away.
Of course then she comes in contact with her distant relatives. St John Rivers is even worse, in my humble opinion. Jane, dear, you are better off alone! But no …she runs back to Rochester and even winds up calling him “my master.” Gag me with a spoon (a BIG one).
Sr Audrey didn’t agree and I only got a ‘C’ in her English class. Oh, well.
I re-read it (March 2007) only because our book club wanted to read a classic and we chose this one. I actually recommended it, hoping that, with maturity, I’d have more appreciation for it. I guess I do appreciate it more, and can look critically at the ideas presented (and how radically feminist it was in its day), but I still don’t like it.
What do you think? Vote in our poll and tell us if you love it or hate it. If you haven’t read it, you can vote on whether you want to or not.
Jane Eyre is my #2 favorite book of all time. It perfectly exemplifies how I feel about books – if it’s written beautifully, no matter what it’s about, I’ll love it. I’ve never been much for romances and I don’t consider Rochester a hero in any way, but I fell in love with the narration in 11th grade and have loved it ever since. (Wuthering Heights, however, about two jerks acting jerkily, I cannot stand behind. Though, I suppose I owe it a reread one of these days.)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Loved it…. 😁
LikeLiked by 1 person
I like it well enough, but I do fall on the side of not getting the . . . well, “hype,” though that is obviously not the right word. I found Jane a little self-righteous (in a very Victorian way that also bothered me about the housekeeper in Wuthering Heights). But I have always preferred Wuthering Heights, possibly because it’s not romantic at all, and rather than justifying the terrible protagonists you’re totally aware of how awful they are.
LikeLike
(And I just can’t bring myself to vote because all of the answers are wrong for me. I need a neutral option. 🙂 )
LikeLiked by 1 person
Loved it!
LikeLike
I read Jane Eyre for a book club and we all had trouble getting through it. It took us 2 months to read. I think it was the style of the writing, Charlotte is very wordy and descriptive if I remember correctly. I didn’t hate it but I didn’t love it either. I am currently reading Wuthering Heights which I am liking much better. Yes the characters are unlikable but the style of writing is better for me. I think the Love It reviewer is Nicole.
LikeLike
I also am abstaining from voting because I neither loved nor hated it. For me it was a fairly average read. I believe my rating was 3/3.5 stars. Gothic literature rarely does much for me and this one was no exception.
LikeLiked by 1 person
For the sake of the intent of this review, I decided to vote. Since I am a long way off from loving it, I placed my vote in the hate camp.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Love it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m with Reviewer B wholeheartedly. I hate this book. I read it in primary school and hated the injustice and general misery. I re-read it fairly recently and added hatred for Rochester and hatred for Jane going against the heroine she could have been and instead running back to him under the idiotic notion that she could save him through love. What a sap.
LikeLiked by 1 person
PS I think Reviewer A is Jen and Reviewer B is Nicole
LikeLiked by 1 person
Interesting guess. I did love the book 😉
LikeLike
This is one of my favorite books. I loved the experience of reading it, though Rochester is no Mr. Darcy or Heathcliff!
So glad to see this feature back! Love the reviews!
LikeLike
Hated it! Thanks for sharing, interesting perspectives!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks for reading!
LikeLike
Hi! I am an interloper on this site, but I was looking for reviews of Jane Eyre, having just reread the book myself.
When I was 14, I hated this book, because to me, Jane was engaging in unnecessary suffering. But I also didn’t understand a lot of it then.
Rereading it as an adult, I like it a lot. I understand it more. It does such a good job of exploring the different facets of feminine love: the wish to be desired, and loved, exactly as one is, without having to change or restrain yourself; but also, the drive towards admiration of a man – his strength, his passion, his mind and his competence. Rochester is a man of ability, and strength; and whatever games he plays, his love for her is straightforward, unreserved, raw. St. John is the other – when you admire competence, excellence, genius, and it draws you, in spite of the individual’s many personal flaws. I’ve felt it, and that’s what I think Jane feels towards St. John (or else she wouldn’t even consider the schemes he proposed).
I think Reviewer B doesn’t really get it. Jane calling Mr. Rochester “Master” is flirtation, and admiration, and love: it’s not about an actual master-slave relationship. As for St. John, a modernized version of the plot would make him a great artist or political activist – it would be more relatable, I think, than a clergyman.
That said, I like Jane Austen more than Charlotte Bronte, in general.
LikeLike
How many bad things can happen to one person? Weirdly, and yet not, it reminded me of ‘A Little Life’. Also, as a scientist, I was annoyed that she was on the cusp of dying after three days without food. I know she was small, but it would take longer than that. The rule of thumb is that you can live a couple weeks w/o food and about 3 days w/o water. Lastly, how many times does she give Rev Rivers a pass because he’s so “good”, read godly. Is he really either of those? Cruel and cold, yes, but good and godly? Hmm. The novel was written in another time and so can’t truly be judged in this one so it’s not a hate it or love it situation – just an interesting and confusing one.
LikeLike